Ask Your Question
0

What are the benefits of puppet standalone?

asked 2014-11-06 01:51:31 -0600

abhishekb gravatar image

What are benefits behind using puppet to configure the machine locally(same machine) if the same thing can be done by OS packages or softwares manually and how it can be useful to puppet standalone architecture rather than having master-client architecture?

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete

2 Answers

Sort by ยป oldest newest most voted
0

answered 2014-11-06 11:07:53 -0600

Walid Shaari gravatar image

several advantages :

  • no extra infrastructure server instances to manage
  • smoke testing on individual nodes
  • more granular control of what to apply
  • more control when, what, and where to apply which manifests
  • can still send reports, and logs to a central server
  • no scale limitations for large scale sites
edit flag offensive delete link more
0

answered 2014-11-06 13:57:11 -0600

rnelson0 gravatar image

Puppet DSL is the same regardless of the underlying OS (though windows and *nix variants have obvious differences in the DSL you would craft) which gives you portability. Upgrading the bash package on Solaris, Debian, and RHEL is the same:

puppet apply -e "package {'bash': ensure => latest}"

The reporting is the same between nodes, and hence portable, so a Solaris and Debian node that fail to install both clearly contain the same error, plus the instance-specific error messages. You have everything you might need to debug without needing to decipher similar-but-not-quite log messages to determine if you were successful.

Because the DSL is idempotent, you can apply the same DSL multiple times without concern about whether or not changes may already be present and will my customized script with little to no error checking do something crazy like insert duplicate lines in this .conf file oh god will I have a job tomorrow? (we've all been there!) You just tell it the state you desire and it makes it so, doing nothing if that is already the system state.

An additional, but potentially smaller, benefit is that puppet simply applies. It handles dialogs for you (compare yum install ... versus puppet apply with a package resource, or vi ... vs an apply that modifies a config). IMO this makes bootstrapping a node very simple, even when that node will never talk to a master.

The DSL provides documentation on the state you specified. If you keep track of all the OS-specific configuration elements, you need to provide additional documentation on the state. Puppet makes recreating your state later - on the next major or minor release, or on a different OS - much easier and very simple to diagnosis if there are failures, as the DSL itself is self-documenting.

You can also check the puppet code into revision control to track the change in your desired state over time. This can often be done with build instructions but is not always as straight forward.

edit flag offensive delete link more

Your Answer

Please start posting anonymously - your entry will be published after you log in or create a new account.

Add Answer

Question Tools

1 follower

Stats

Asked: 2014-11-06 01:51:31 -0600

Seen: 535 times

Last updated: Nov 06 '14